Efficiency Improvement of the Clinical Pathway in Cardiac Monitor Insertion and Follow-up : Retrospective Analysis
Vanhala, Ville; Surakka, Outi; Multisilta, Vilma; Lundsby Johansen, Mette; Villinger, Jonas; Nicolle, Emmanuelle; Heikkilä, Johanna; Korhonen, Pentti (2024)
Vanhala, Ville
Surakka, Outi
Multisilta, Vilma
Lundsby Johansen, Mette
Villinger, Jonas
Nicolle, Emmanuelle
Heikkilä, Johanna
Korhonen, Pentti
JMIR Publications
2024
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2025032721627
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2025032721627
Tiivistelmä
Background: The insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) clinical pathway in Tampere Heart Hospital, Finland, did not correspond
to the diagnostic needs of the population. There has been growing evidence of delegating the insertion from cardiologists to
specially trained nurses and outsourcing the remote follow-up. However, it is unclear if the change in the clinical pathway is
safe and improves efficiency.
Objective: We aim to describe and assess the efficiency of the change in the ICM clinical pathway.
Methods: Pathway improvements included initiating nurse-performed insertions, relocating the procedure from the catheteri zation laboratory to a procedure room, and outsourcing part of the remote follow-up to manage ICM workload. Data were
collected from electronic health records of all patients who received an ICM in the Tampere Heart Hospital in 2018 and 2020.
Follow-up time was 36 months after insertion.
Results: The number of inserted ICMs doubled from 74 in 2018 to 159 in 2020. In 2018, cardiologists completed all
insertions, while in 2020, a total of 70.4% (n=112) were completed by nurses. The waiting time from referral to procedure was
significantly shorter in 2020 (mean 36, SD 27.7 days) compared with 2018 (mean 49, SD 37.3 days; P=.02). The scheduled
ICM procedure time decreased from 60 minutes in 2018 to 45 minutes in 2020. Insertions performed in the catheterization
laboratory decreased significantly (n=14, 18.9% in 2018 and n=3, 1.9% in 2020; P=<.001). Patients receiving an ICM after
syncope increased from 71 to 94 patients. Stroke and transient ischemic attack as an indication increased substantially from
2018 to 2020 (2 and 62 patients, respectively). In 2018, nurses analyzed all remote transmissions. In 2020, the external
monitoring service escalated only 11.2% (204/1817) of the transmissions to the clinic for revision. This saved 296 hours of
nursing time in 2020. Having nurses insert ICMs in 2020 saved 48 hours of physicians’ time and the shorter scheduling for the
procedure saved an additional 40 hours of nursing time compared with the process in 2018. Additionally, the catheterization
laboratory was released for other procedures (27 h/y). The complication rate did not change significantly (n=2, 2.7% in 2018
and n=5, 3.1% in 2020; P=.85). The 36-month diagnostic yield for syncope remained high in 2018 and 2020 (n=32, 45.1% and
n=36, 38.3%; P=.38). The diagnostic yield for patients who had stroke with a procedure in 2020 was 43.5% (n=27).
Conclusions: The efficiency of the clinical pathway for patients eligible for an ICM insertation can be increased significantly
by shifting to nurse-led insertions in procedure rooms and to the use of an external monitoring and triaging service.
to the diagnostic needs of the population. There has been growing evidence of delegating the insertion from cardiologists to
specially trained nurses and outsourcing the remote follow-up. However, it is unclear if the change in the clinical pathway is
safe and improves efficiency.
Objective: We aim to describe and assess the efficiency of the change in the ICM clinical pathway.
Methods: Pathway improvements included initiating nurse-performed insertions, relocating the procedure from the catheteri zation laboratory to a procedure room, and outsourcing part of the remote follow-up to manage ICM workload. Data were
collected from electronic health records of all patients who received an ICM in the Tampere Heart Hospital in 2018 and 2020.
Follow-up time was 36 months after insertion.
Results: The number of inserted ICMs doubled from 74 in 2018 to 159 in 2020. In 2018, cardiologists completed all
insertions, while in 2020, a total of 70.4% (n=112) were completed by nurses. The waiting time from referral to procedure was
significantly shorter in 2020 (mean 36, SD 27.7 days) compared with 2018 (mean 49, SD 37.3 days; P=.02). The scheduled
ICM procedure time decreased from 60 minutes in 2018 to 45 minutes in 2020. Insertions performed in the catheterization
laboratory decreased significantly (n=14, 18.9% in 2018 and n=3, 1.9% in 2020; P=<.001). Patients receiving an ICM after
syncope increased from 71 to 94 patients. Stroke and transient ischemic attack as an indication increased substantially from
2018 to 2020 (2 and 62 patients, respectively). In 2018, nurses analyzed all remote transmissions. In 2020, the external
monitoring service escalated only 11.2% (204/1817) of the transmissions to the clinic for revision. This saved 296 hours of
nursing time in 2020. Having nurses insert ICMs in 2020 saved 48 hours of physicians’ time and the shorter scheduling for the
procedure saved an additional 40 hours of nursing time compared with the process in 2018. Additionally, the catheterization
laboratory was released for other procedures (27 h/y). The complication rate did not change significantly (n=2, 2.7% in 2018
and n=5, 3.1% in 2020; P=.85). The 36-month diagnostic yield for syncope remained high in 2018 and 2020 (n=32, 45.1% and
n=36, 38.3%; P=.38). The diagnostic yield for patients who had stroke with a procedure in 2020 was 43.5% (n=27).
Conclusions: The efficiency of the clinical pathway for patients eligible for an ICM insertation can be increased significantly
by shifting to nurse-led insertions in procedure rooms and to the use of an external monitoring and triaging service.