Comparison analysis of building a new factory verses acquiring an existing one for operating in the Chinese market
Makarov, Maksim (2018)
Hämeen ammattikorkeakoulu
2018
All rights reserved
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:amk-2018112618174
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:amk-2018112618174
Tiivistelmä
This thesis is written based on the case of the company Rotork. The case took place at the beginning of 2000. This thesis provides a comparison analysis of which is more beneficial for a globally operating industrial manufacturing company in Chinese market: building of a new factory or acquire the existing one.
The main sources of information and data are interviews of the decision-making personnel of the company and an analysis of existing sources of the related topic such as professional literature and articles. The examination of the topic is provided through different factors and aspects. Analysis of the case from these factors and aspects helped to get a fulfilled answer to the given question in this strategic transaction processes.
After provided research and analysis of the question the following conclusions and recommendation were given. It was clearly identified what was more beneficial for Rotork company in this strategic transaction case and why. In conclusion it was briefly stated the future paths of both companies, which was time proof of the correctly made decision for all the parties.
The main sources of information and data are interviews of the decision-making personnel of the company and an analysis of existing sources of the related topic such as professional literature and articles. The examination of the topic is provided through different factors and aspects. Analysis of the case from these factors and aspects helped to get a fulfilled answer to the given question in this strategic transaction processes.
After provided research and analysis of the question the following conclusions and recommendation were given. It was clearly identified what was more beneficial for Rotork company in this strategic transaction case and why. In conclusion it was briefly stated the future paths of both companies, which was time proof of the correctly made decision for all the parties.